UAP Analyst
Review real declassified military UAP cases — FLIR footage, radar tracks, pilot reports — and issue your official civilian classification. Our AI military analyst reviews your picks.
Are these real UAP cases?
Yes. All 8 cases are drawn from real incidents documented by the US Navy, AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office), and publicly released congressional testimony. The incidents include the famous Tic-Tac (2004), Gimbal (2015), and Jellyfish UAP (2023). The imagery is a stylized thermal recreation of the FLIR/infrared sensor data from those encounters — the actual declassified footage can be found on the AARO website and through FOIA releases.
What is the military analyst doing?
Each case has a purpose-written intelligence assessment for every possible classification. They're dry, bureaucratic, case-specific, and slightly unnerving — never confirming or denying anything, always referencing the actual incident details. The "PROCESSING" delay and typing effect are purely for atmosphere.
What is the Analyst Clearance Level?
At the end of all 8 cases, your picks are scored against the government's official verdicts (most cases are officially "Unresolved"). The scoring produces an Analyst Clearance Level from 1 (Skeptic Civilian — you said balloon on everything) to 5 (Area 51 Intern — you went extraterrestrial on everything). Level 3–4 aligns with the official government position.
Are the crowd statistics real?
The baseline crowd numbers are seeded from realistic distributions (no serious analyst says "balloon" on the Tic-Tac). Your votes are added to your local session. There is no backend — this is a fully private, no-tracking, single-file tool.